Talixis Mining ServicesStudies, assays and gravity plants, Nigeria
← Desktop studies

Case study · Desktop study

Is this free ground worth a licence?

A block of free ground in a gold-bearing schist belt, 2 km from known artisanal gold workings. We tested it from the desk before any money went on the ground, and found that the best ground lay just outside it.

30 unitsAbout 6.4 km² of free ground
10 testsTitle, geology, geophysics, land, security, licence
79thPercentile of the strip we added, against 49th for the block
GoOn four conditions, before filing

The question

The block sat in Nigeria's basement complex, on a schist belt with a record of gold. Artisanal miners were working 2 km away, yet the block itself was untitled. The question was simple: is it worth an exploration licence, and is the outline right?

We ran this study in-house, on a real block, to show what a desktop study delivers. The block's name, coordinates and nearby places are left out here. A client's study is never published.

What we checked

Every source below is public or licensed national data, read against the block's exact outline.

  • Mining CadastreTitle status of the block and its neighbours, and pending applications
  • Geology and researchPublished geological maps and studies of the belt and its gold
  • National prospectivity modelsThe government's gold and pegmatite favourability models
  • High-resolution airborne surveyMagnetics and radiometrics, processed for structure and alteration
  • Land and protected areasVillages, roads, and forest reserves from international and state records
  • Community and securityThe district's record of disputes, illegal mining and incidents on the roads
  • Licence route and feesLicence type, fees, filing requirements and the earliest filing date
  • Neighbouring groundEvery strip of free cells around the block, scored the same way

The scorecard

Six of ten tests passed, three needed watching and one was weak. None ruled the block out.

TestWhat we foundRating
TitleFree on the Mining Cadastre; no pending application seenPass
Host rockBasement rock of a gold-bearing schist belt, well clear of the sedimentary basinPass
Known gold nearbyArtisanal gold workings 2 km away; more mapped occurrences about 5 km offPass
Government modelsRated low on all three national prospectivity modelsWeak
StructureA shear-like magnetic low ends at the block's edge; the block itself is below averageWatch
AlterationAverage potassium gain; a uranium–thorium band suggests pegmatitesWatch
Settlements and landNo village inside the block; the nearest is 2 km awayPass
Protected areasNearest listed forest reserve about 10 km away; state confirmation still neededPass
SecurityKidnap attempts on the approach road this year; illegal mining in the districtWatch
Licence routeExploration licence now, with the right to convert to a small-scale lease laterPass

The key finding: the best ground was next door

The airborne magnetics showed a narrow low, the likely trace of a shear zone, running 2 km from the workings to the block's northern edge, then fading. On our gold screen the block ranked just below typical. The strip to its north, which holds the whole low, ranked far higher.

  • Strip to the north24 units · recommended
    79
  • North strip, narrower15 units
    77
  • Two rows to the south10 units
    66
  • The block as first drawn30 units
    49
  • Two columns to the west12 units
    48
  • Two columns to the east12 units
    25

Gold screen: structure and alteration from the airborne survey, each ranked against all basement rock on the survey sheet (50 = typical, dashed line). It ranks where to look first; it is not a chance of finding gold.

The verdict

Go, on conditions: file for 54 units, not 30

Add the 24 units to the north if they are free. The licence application fee is the same up to 100 units, so the larger block costs only its yearly fees, and it takes in the structure the gold is most likely to follow.

  1. Confirm on the Cadastre that the northern strip is free.
  2. Have a geoscientist confirm the magnetic low and read the 1:100,000 geological map.
  3. Get written confirmation from the state that no forest reserve overlaps.
  4. Sign landowner consent before filing, through the traditional council.

Without the study, the obvious move was to file for the 30 units as drawn. That would have held average ground and left the most promising structure open to the next applicant.

What the client receives

  • A written reportThe findings, the scorecard and a clear recommendation, in plain language.
  • Maps and GIS filesAirborne layers over the block, plus Google Earth and GIS files of every outline.
  • Field check pointsSix points to visit first, each with its coordinates and what to look for.
  • The licence routeLicence type, fees, documents and the earliest date you can file.
  • A risk registerEach risk to the block, with how to handle it before money is spent.
  • A first work stepThe smallest field programme that answers the main question.

Have a block in mind?

Send the licence number or the block's corners, and the question you want answered. We reply within two working days with a scope and a fee.